« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Right to Work, and not pay a Union 

By: ribit in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 13 Jan 16 7:28 AM | 141 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 18574 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 18570 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ocu
In other words, there is no such thing as a free lunch, something that should be well understood by conservatives.

...I have just negotiated a grand contract on your behalf that you did not ask for nor want. Please forward a hundred grand for my services. Thank you.

BTW: I don't think government employees should be unionized at all. Why do they need it? The government is wise and all knowing generous to a flaw and has only the best interest of all at heart.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Right to Work, and not pay a Union
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT3
Wed, 13 Jan 16 3:29 AM
Msg. 18570 of 65535

The law in question does NOT require that anyone join a union nor pay union dues.

What it does do is say that anyone who benefits from contractual agreements won as the result of collective bargaining by a union, that that union has the right to collect from those non-union members a fee, which is already part of the dues that union members pay, which has been assessed to recover the costs associated with only the collective bargaining activities of the union. In other words, there is no such thing as a free lunch, something that should be well understood by conservatives.

As I mentioned previously, the law in question had already been ruled constitutional with a UNANIMOUS decision in 1977 by the Burger court, which was generally considered to be a conservative Supreme Court.


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next