Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Is this the real reason that we even have a 2nd Amendment... 

By: ribit in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (1)
Fri, 01 Jan 16 9:48 PM | 79 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3 		Msg. 18156 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 18154 by zzstar)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

zzfart
...the regulated militia in question was the STANDING ARMY that the founders wanted ordinary citizens to have the ability to resist. Ergo the following about nott quartering troops in homes, unlawful search and seizure.

...what you are doing is moving the goalposts around to fit your argument rather than making your argument fit.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Is this the real reason that we even have a 2nd Amendment...
By: zzstar in FFFT3
Fri, 01 Jan 16 8:33 PM 		Msg. 18154 of 65535

The 2nd amendment is in one sentence, with commas. No period before the right of the people to bear arms, because that right is associated to the "regulated militia", otherwise it would be in its own sentence, following a period, and then you could have the current interpretation, which is wrong, and contradicts the regulated militia piece, which makes no sense to even exist and be mentioned. Who cares about regulated militia, if everyone/anyone can have guns?

Eh?

Anyone who thinks there is a different interpretation can state it here, and explain why.

« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next