« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

This is the exact opposite of what the Court suggested should have been the Congressional response to their 'Citizens United' ruling, that is that these 501c PAC's should disclose their donors...  

By: oldCADuser in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 16 Dec 15 10:23 PM | 74 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 17847 of 65535
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Congress Is About To Make Citizens United Even Worse

It's making political spending less and less transparent.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sec-disclosure-political-spending_56717f55e4b0648fe301a84c

To see what the Court had to say about what should be done next, this was taken from the item below showing what the majority opinion in the 'Citizens United' case stated about disclosure, something that Congress is ultimately responsible for addressing:

The majority opinion argued for the disclosure of the sources of campaign contributions, saying that

...prompt disclosure of expenditures can provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable for their positions and supporters. Shareholders can determine whether their corporation’s political speech advances the corporation’s interest in making profits, and citizens can see whether elected officials are "in the pocket" of so-called moneyed interests...This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC#Majority_opinion




Avatar

OCU




» You can also:
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next