I take the point. If it wasn't for the fact that ISIS seems to have just turned on the spigot of international terrorism which dilutes the stats, I might be more relaxed.
Here's how I would argue the opposite.
How many American lives will it take for you to acknowledge the problem? Another 14? 140? 2,977? What is the meaningful percentage?
If you were to say, but it hasn't happened yet ... I agree.
And don't you think it is better to run ahead of the curve? So that the casualties are prevented before they occur.
The problems of Europe are surely coming to the USA. Nothing inoculates Americans from this problem. We can all see the recent expansion of terror from Boko Haram in Nigeria around the Moslem Crescent, through Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Egypt and Iraq to ISIS in Syria. These groups have infiltrated Moslem communities in Europe with hundreds joining ISIS from countries such as France, Belgium and the UK and turned them into terrorists too. Many such terrorists have crossed the Aegean, the Mediterranean, the Bosphorus and the Pillars of Hercules and entered Europe. Europe has tried harder than America to accept Moslem immigrants. It has more of them. It has been running the same multiculturalism model in various shades. It hasn't worked.
Surely the risk is manifest. Heck, these guys were devious enough to infiltrate the marriage waiver programme. America is next. When the risk is clearly present, you must act.
Obama's model is a glorified version of doing nothing much. Every avenue of action is closed. Sitting ducks come to mind.
For myself, I thought Bush's Afghanistan adventure was justified and it aroused global support. Iraq was the disaster. I think Obama could lever the necessary support to create a coalition to wipe out ISIS. I don't care that this "is what they want". It is what I think will work that matters to me.