« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming 

By: ribit in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 21 Nov 15 10:53 PM | 103 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 17145 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 17136 by keystone)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

keystone
...no, I believe that global warming is the boogeyman of the new left. We do not have the technology to raise or lower the earths temperature at all. There could be some miniscule increase in global temperature, but the earth's temperature has ALWAYS been moving up or down. This is not a static environment.

...another thing is that with the rest of the world coming online for energy consumption and using mostly coal, there is no change the rest of the world cculd make that would have any effect on reducing same.

Boyles law applies to a CLOSED SYSTEM.
The absolute pressure exerted by a given mass of an ideal gas is inversely proportional to the volume it occupies if the temperature and amount of gas remain unchanged within a closed system.

The planet is not in a pressure cooker. It is more like a balloon with gravity providing the shell.

...and now a question for you. If global warming is real, why do they have to use bogus data to prove it???




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming
By: keystone
in FFFT3
Sat, 21 Nov 15 5:03 PM
Msg. 17136 of 65535

Good Morning Ribit!

Actually not.

I suspect you are about as knowledgeable about the science of weather as a bumblebee sucking pollen from a petal.

Please.
Before you chide me for the depth of my intellectual perspicacity, learn Boyles law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyle%27s_law

Intuitively the enormity of the Earth should buffer the effect of all human intervention.
The problem is that it doesn't.

The degradation of the Earth since the onset of the industrial revolution began has been horrific.

These are facts, not opinions.

No man, or planet, is an island unto himself.

There are not usually political answers to scientific questions.

When you hear political opinions given to refute scientific assertions you are typically dealing with a person not prone to verify anything beyond his own cognition.

Not that this might be the case with you, of course,
your political views are so exact and so succinct and so clearly thought out, that I am comforted that you have decided global warming is simply a nonsense story concocted by a few scientists most likely smoking dope or eating peyote.

Drugged out urchins.


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next