« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: women and medicare

By: tkc in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 07 Nov 15 7:40 AM | 91 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 17516 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 17514 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Alea, you know I understand. As an FA I sold insurance. Men pay more for Life ins. than women. Why? Men pay more than women for auto ins. Why? Women and men pay the same for healthcare ins.but women use it more. Why? Because health ins. is primarily provided via employers thru group ins. which considers the entire group actuarily. Covering pre-existing condition is a good thing, the right thing and although it raises premiums, I'm for it. Ins Cos take into consideration that several may have a child w/ cerebral palsy and we all share that cost. I suggest you are deflecting. We don't yet know which child will be born w/ some terrible afflection so sharing risk is inderstandable. We do know that women will use healthcare more, social security more and medicare more. Bottom line, I'm ok w/ all that even though I think it favors women. I don't like the ACA contraception stuff.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: women and medicare
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sat, 07 Nov 15 6:51 AM
Msg. 17514 of 54959

hi tkc,

it's a fun thought process to consider. to an extent, i think you are experimenting with the idea to see what comes back, maybe.

here's why i think we don't discriminate.

because we share medical costs across the whole of society, rather than differentially. that's how a medical insurance system works. those that don't need help partly bear the burden for those who do.

otherwise you say, well, that person has cerebral palsy - let's exclude them. because money.

or using your model, i might argue that old people cost more than young people. so they should pay more. but for insurance purposes, we need young people to participate to spread the cost. and across a whole life, we all end up getting older.

similarly, we are all the product of male sperm and female eggs. we all require a person of the opposite sex to produce a child. so in order for the species to survive, we are all in this together.

it isn't about individuals. it's about sharing access to healthcare and sharing costs in a way that understands you might be the next patient and you may want the help yourself.

i might also apply the equitable principle that no one ought to be discriminated against for inherited characteristics. a person born female did not choose to do so. hence, they shouldn't accrue disadvantages as a consequence. same as we treat people of different skin colours equally. but under your principle, we might say that black people should pay extra because some of them are more susceptible to sickle cell anemia.

that's a couple of reasons that come to mind immediately. i think there are many more.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next