« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Sen. Schumer’s illogical case against the Iran deal 

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (4)
Sun, 16 Aug 15 4:32 AM | 99 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 14771 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 14766 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Taken apart piece by piece.....

Schumer is an Israeli agent, and stupid at that. He is not fit to take Reid's place either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dear-sen-schumer-dont-vote-against-the-iran-nuclear-deal/2015/08/13/7b806630-41f4-11e5-846d-02792f854297_story.html

One read of this and you can see Schumer is full of crap.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Bush National Security Adviser Backs Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal
By: clo
in FFFT3
Sat, 15 Aug 15 8:53 PM
Msg. 14766 of 65535

Bush National Security Adviser Backs Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal

By: Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Friday, August, 14th, 2015, 7:55 am
.....
They write,

We both were elected to the Senate in 1978 and privileged to have served together on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 30 years, during which we each held committee leadership positions of chairman or ranking minority member. We support the Iran Agreement negotiated by the United States and other leading world powers for many reasons, including its limitations on Iran’s nuclear activities, its strong inspections regime, and the ability to quickly re-impose sanctions should Iran violate its provisions.

However, they have a reason perhaps our collection of chickenhawks might even understand if they could understand that the military has value even when it is not being actively used:

“But we also see a compelling reason to support the agreement that has gotten little attention: Rejecting it would weaken the deterrent value of America’s military option.”

They point out that “it’s highly unlikely that our traditional European allies, let alone China and Russia, would support the use of the military option since we had undermined the diplomatic path.” We would be effectively isolating ourselves from the allies we would need in the event we felt military intervention necessary. The senators are talking here about “access rights, logistics, intelligence, and other critical support.”

Imagine that. We’re stronger with allies than without. Even Dubya knew that, for all his devotion to cowboy diplomacy and his asserted right to attack anybody who at any future date had a chance of becoming a threat to the U.S.

It is difficult to admit, but there is ample reason to believe our current crop of Republican leaders are even more myopic than George W. Bush. Bush understood – belatedly – that calling his Iran War a holy crusade was maybe a little over the top. But Republicans today, a decade later, positively relish the role of holy avengers, smiting uppity Islam in the name of their god.

more:
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/08/14/dubyas-national-security-adviser-backs-obamas-iran-nuclear-deal.html


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next