the real armp of course is capable of marshalling facts to deliver an argument.
and makes points that are robust against criticism.
abob armp invokes historians he does not name in favour of an argument that he doesn't make.
doesn't smell right.
i am thinking they aren't the same person at all.
just a pitiful shape-shifter adopting someone else's weeds and attempting to steal their reputation to make a point that fits their own capabilities.
it's another ban until the matter is clarified by the real armp.
| 
