« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: U.S. Sided With Tax-Avoiding Companies Over Contracting Ban 

By: joe-taylor in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 06 Jul 15 8:05 PM | 93 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 13986 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 13982 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Clo,

Barack Obama is a pragmatist. In part, that means that what works. It is very possible that some or all of these companies are doing critical work for the government that no one else can do. The fact that the Department of Homeland Security is involved only adds possible substantiation to that fact. I am personally very opposed to giving government contracts to tax avoiders but, as the Halliburton example in Iraq proves, you can not only be too big to fail, but also be the only one big enough to handle the job at hand.


To say that "God exists" is the greatest understatement ever made across space and time.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
U.S. Sided With Tax-Avoiding Companies Over Contracting Ban
By: clo
in FFFT3
Mon, 06 Jul 15 4:53 PM
Msg. 13982 of 65535

This is another example of how Obama disappoints many of us... WHY on earth would he abandon his 'original' position & then act as if...

U.S. Sided With Tax-Avoiding Companies Over Contracting Ban
by Zachary Mider
July 6, 2015 — 5:00 AM EDT

The Obama administration quietly handed a victory to U.S. companies that avoid taxes by claiming a foreign address, suggesting that virtually all of them are still eligible for government contracts.

The Department of Homeland Security last year endorsed a legal memorandum that argued in part that a 2002 law banning such companies from federal contracts was invalid, according to a copy of the memo obtained by Bloomberg News. Although President Barack Obama later began publicly criticizing the tax maneuvers known as inversions, there’s no sign that he has reversed the department’s decision.

.....
The correspondence came during a record wave of corporate address changes, including moves by Burger King and medical device-maker Medtronic Plc.

Almost 50 companies have now inverted, most of them in the past five years, and a Congressional panel estimated last year that future inversions would cost the Treasury $19.5 billion in forgone revenue over the following decade. 

A Homeland Security spokeswoman said the department follows the law and declined to comment further. The White House also declined to comment.

‘Corporate Deserters’

Rosa DeLauro, part of a group of liberal Congressional Democrats who want to tighten the law, called it “abhorrent” that Homeland Security would allow such companies to get contracts. “The federal government should be making it harder for corporate deserters to get contracts, not easier,” she said in a statement.

much more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-06/u-s-sided-with-tax-avoiding-companies-over-contracting-ban


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next