From a huff-n-puff article :
>>>
Puhleese, folks: let's get real! The first fallacy essentially ignores the massive potential impact -- for good or for ill -- of redirecting the $150+ trillion in stocks and bonds owned by public and corporate pension funds, insurance companies, endowments and foundations, family offices, and high net worth individuals.
>>>
What is wrong with this picture?
Please, what is right with it?
The thieves and morons who swallow this tripe apparently believe that 'THEY' should have the 'right' to direct where folks pensions, or other private investments, should be invested. And, that is wrong on so many levels.
Can anyone imagine what would have happened had obamba been able to take that $150 Trillion and 'invest' it in companies like Solyndra?
(Solyndra, and all the other companies obamba 'invested' in, went bankrupt.)
Can you say 'Bye Bye Pensions' ? Pensions and most investment funds should be invested in more 'conservative' vehicles. Assets which will almost certainly generate profits to make the pension payouts.
But the gall of clowns like the author . . . .
Thinking that it is OK to steal and misappropriate other peoples assets . . .
Zim.
| 