« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Empirical Evidence of Global Warming

By: DGpeddler in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 11 Jan 15 10:35 PM | 86 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 07460 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 07457 by keystone)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #


Do you eat cooked or raw food? How do you cook it?

Does your house have heating and air conditioning?

Do you use mechanical transportation?

Do you work for a living? If so, are machines involved?

Do you have kids? If so, do they do any of the above?

If you answered yes to ANY OF THE ABOVE, why are YOU more important than me or my family?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Empirical Evidence of Global Warming
By: keystone
in FFFT3
Sun, 11 Jan 15 10:11 PM
Msg. 07457 of 65535

George Will aside, with his history of 15th Century famine, there is more than adequate evidence of global warming.

More than 90% of scientists and climatologists agree.
The planet is getting warmer.

No matter how some chose to politicize science, there is overwhelming evidence that objective, determined activity by man can and will have a beneficial effect on the planet.

Man did not put thousands of tons of hydrocarbons into the atmosphere until the industrial revolution.
Burning fossil fuels has a direct effect on the planet.

Burning coal in China has an immediate effect on tens of millions of people. Shortening lives. Causing cancer. This is death directly attributable to human action.

George Will can't supply respirators and face masks to one hundred million Chinese.

We live on a planet. It is a closed biosystem.
If we crap on it enough without opening the window it is going to get fouled.

Madame Curie played with chemicals. She was a scientist.
George Will is what? A political satirist with an audience incapable of handling his vocabulary?

Rightest bullshit about there being no climatological effect on this planet through human activity is base, low level, ignorance.

The idea that since human life is relatively eternal in terms of our lifetimes, we can ignore without peril warning signals, may or might or could destroy the future for generations unborn.

Desertification. The destruction of the rain forest. The overuse of ground water. Burning fossil fuels.

Since Rachel Carson the literate world has taken much note of this little petri dish we all live in.

The future of the human race is dependent upon how we care for this planet.
If you don't believe that you deny science and put the future in peril.

Human freedom is not challenged by ecological care.
It is enhanced.



« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next