hi clo,
us presidents only occasionally have foreign affairs/diplomatic experience. it is useful but it doesn't have much effect on how people vote.
at the same time, hc voted for the iraq war and took the side of government over surveillance. and for me, that shows she moves with the herd, which is no use at all.
generals sometimes end up as presidents. imagine how different world history might have been if general powell had stood.
it would be nice to see a woman president. for me, hc is too much of a politician, fails to take a stand where it matters (at least since healthcare) and so i don't expect her to do much of anything. if she said, for instance, she had a proposal to remove money from politics, changing the constitution as needs be, and that she wants to resize wall street - these kinds of things - i would be supportive. but she is always on the side of her resources.
i don't see what difference she would make as president. i only see she wants to be.
warren believes in stuff and she isn't a tool of incumbent interests. that's why i like her.