« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: chokehold case

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 04 Dec 14 7:22 PM | 17 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 16397 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 16384 by faul)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"This is the system you defend................"

Yes. I defend a system of laws. Anarchy is not my preference.

But of course, any system requires tweaking.

As I have said many times, where bankers have broken the law, I would like to see them caught and punished in much the same way as blue collar criminals.

But it is also a principle of law that you can't apply new law to actions which were taken previously. The law confronts a difficulty where innovation occurs. It is usually behind the curve.

Where police break the law I also want them to be caught and punished. But they do a very difficult job and where a person assaults them, they are entitled to defend themselves. This is the key distinction between the Brown case and the chokehold one. For me, the Garner death looked and sounded like a homicide.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: chokehold case
By: faul
in ALEA
Thu, 04 Dec 14 2:40 PM
Msg. 16384 of 54959

He was murdered for allegedly selling loose
cigarettes on the street,the police officer
who murdered him in an illegal choke hold then
gets set free.......

Also the guy who filmed the murder then gets
arrested on trumped up charges......

That's how the LAW works.....

If on the other hand you are a banker & admit to
illegally manipulating benchmark rates & anything else ,profitíng hundreds of billions dollars you get
a small fine.

This is the system you defend................



« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next