« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Black holes and Big Bang theory wrong claims Scientist!

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 26 Sep 14 11:11 PM | 112 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 16259 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 16258 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"appealing to the authority of a few random websites is not terribly persuasive. there are plenty of theories in cyberspace. if you are going to appeal to authority, i would have thought you could point to something which showed links to peer-reviewed research papers specifically on this topic. perhaps a wikipedia page. something."

The three pioneers of plasma cosmology are Kristian Birkeland, Irving Langmuir and Hannes Alfven......

Birkeland was nominated for the Nobel prize 7 times,Irving & Langmuir both won the Nobel prize..........hardly basement
conspiracy joes with a crackpot theory and a few random
websites.

Your gravity universe belongs in the stone-age............


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Black holes and Big Bang theory wrong claims Scientist!
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 26 Sep 14 6:00 PM
Msg. 16258 of 54959

yes, but only if the idea stands up to questioning.

just because some theories do doesn't mean all new ideas make sense.

just because some ideas are old doesn't make them wrong. indeed, you have successfully to disprove them in order to make them go away.

but you have to be fairly confident of your insight if you are not especially well informed about your subject-matter and yet hold a strong opinion.

appealing to the authority of a few random websites is not terribly persuasive. there are plenty of theories in cyberspace. if you are going to appeal to authority, i would have thought you could point to something which showed links to peer-reviewed research papers specifically on this topic. perhaps a wikipedia page. something.

there are plenty of ways to attack physics without suggesting that gravity is a form of electrical force.

why is it that almost no trained physicists have adopted the electric universe model. perhaps it is because it isn't a strong theory? maybe it is just a loch ness monster.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next