"Einstein said his equations proved the Universe is static & infinite"
I think it was the other way around. Einstein produced a cosmological constant to conform with the then current theory of a static universe. There was no information with which to challenge that assumption.
When he learnt about Hubble's expansive universe data, he was mad at himself for adding the constant as without it he would have predicted the big bang himself: "If there is no quasi-static world, then away with the cosmological term!"
More recently, though, the cosmological constant has been recycled to explain accelerated expansion and dark energy.
Of course science changes. You are still stuck on the idea that science is static. The aim of science is to evolve better theories by testing existing hypotheses. When new things are learnt, theories also change. The scientific method creates the closest approximations to truth that are currently available. But in the end, even Newton's laws were surpassed.
This does your electric universe theory no good, unfortunately. Adaptation of existing scientific theories doesn't mean your own model is accepted. This idea of yours that this is a partisan contest is idiosyncratic. Most folks only care what is most likely to be correct.
| 