Some more info from Moore's missive..
...(Notably, at trial, in response to arguments that damages should be limited based on settlements entered into with other licensees and one license in particular, Mr. Leckrone had to argue that the particular settlement with that licensee was not a true comparable because the low settlement was accepted not as commensurate with the value of the license conferred but to provide revenue for cash-strapped TPL)
---This most assuredly is regarding APPLE, and the meager dollar amount it garnered---
Just more details emerging, demonstrating why there was suddenly a serious NEED for Lecky to invoke his---self imposed--- NDA requirement.
I HAVE to believe that, CJ was cognizant of all of Lecky's shenanigans, right from the start.
| 
