« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Health Law Subsidies Upheld, Conflicting With Ruling Hours Earlier

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 23 Jul 14 4:50 AM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 16021 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 16020 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi clo,

It is. If this is the way it works, I doubt America's chances as a nation in the long run. You can't have a legal system that denies a party the right to govern and a people the right to the government it desires.

It's already obvious that the advantages the US once had have been lost. On how many measures does it have to decline before folks realise the system doesn't work very well?

eg How relatively expensive does US healthcare have to become before the courts allow a government to permit a new approach? It costs 2 1/2 times as much to service the healthcare requirements of US citizens as UK subjects. That is ridiculous.

The courts have to allow some latitude for interpretation. Look at how they define the second amendment. It is possible to read words in different ways.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Health Law Subsidies Upheld, Conflicting With Ruling Hours Earlier
By: clo
in ALEA
Wed, 23 Jul 14 4:24 AM
Msg. 16020 of 54959

If 2 (Republican appointed) out of 3 justices gut this law, it would be based on a typo!

they would also erode democracy....

Obama was elected TWICE, the people in part voted for him because of the ACA.

How do republicans run saying they took your healthcare AWAY? This is horrendous.



« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next