« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: CNBC's Rick Santelli Had His Biggest On-Air Blowup In A Long Time

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 17 Jul 14 7:57 PM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15903 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15887 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Here's why Rick Santelli imagines he's been right all along.

"James Pethokoukis and Ramesh Ponnuru are frustrated. They’ve been trying to convert Republicans to market monetarism, but the right’s favorite intellectuals keep turning to cranks peddling conspiracy theories about inflation. Three years ago it was Niall Ferguson, citing a bogus source. Ferguson was widely ridiculed, by moderate conservatives as well as liberals — but here comes Amity Shlaes, making the same argument and citing the same source. The “reform conservatives” have made no headway at all.

Why this lack of progress?

The answer is that inflation paranoia isn’t a simple misunderstanding that can be corrected by pointing to evidence. It’s deeply embedded in the modern conservative psyche. Government action must, by definition, have disastrous results; and whatever market monetarists may try to say, their political comrades will continue to lump monetary policy in with fiscal stimulus and Obamacare. And fiat money can’t work — Francisco D’Anconia said so, and it must be true. So it’s always the 70s, if not Weimar, and if the numbers say otherwise, they must be cooked. Evidence has a well-known liberal bias.

Even the rare conservative willing to admit that we don’t yet have high inflation won’t admit that this suggests something wrong with models that predicted a huge inflation surge. No, it’s just a miracle.

So market monetarism isn’t going anywhere, politically."

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: CNBC's Rick Santelli Had His Biggest On-Air Blowup In A Long Time
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Tue, 15 Jul 14 5:22 AM
Msg. 15887 of 54959

The folks who insisted inflation was the immediate and inevitable effect of the Fed's monetary expansion were proved wrong.

But it hasn't stopped them moving the goalposts to where others were originally.

Which is to say, inflation will be the product of economic recovery and not of quantitative easing.

When the economy gets out from its torpor, inflation will reappear and interest rates will rise.

Unfortunately folks like Santelli don't even admit that they were wrong, let alone understand why.

But if you thought QE would result in inflation, there's a problem in your economics. Even if the dogma survives.

It was a very comforting thing to live through these events with a theory that reflected economic performance. Knowing that QE was nothing to panic about.

But it was a shame that the opportunity to build infrastructure at a low rate of interest was foresworn.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next