What's going to happen the first time some ultra-religous conservative businessman denies service to an inter-racial couple, or a single parent, or a person who was born our of wedlock or some other situation in which he claims that accommodating a customer would 'violate' his religious beliefs? Where will it end? How has the Supreme Court NOT opened Pandora's Box?
Remember awhile back when some religious parents were arguing against the anti-bullying laws being proposed for our schools on the grounds that this would interfere with them teaching their children how people with their beliefs are supposed to interact with other people, which in this case was their kids beating-up 'fags' and 'queers'. I wonder how many of these parents will now site the Hobby Lobby case as rational for teaching their kids to hate people who don't meet their religious standards?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/05/anti-bullying-laws-christian-religious-freedom_n_1406757.html
http://swampland.time.com/2011/11/04/why-does-michigans-anti-bullying-bill-protect-religious-tormenters/