…that 'Tea party' groups were somehow denied their rights by the IRS when he states:
"As yet there is no evidence Obama knew of the IRS plot to delay and deny tax exemptions to tea party groups, which would be an abuse of power and a trampling upon the constitutional rights of tea partiers, who were denied the equal protection of the laws."
He seems to forget that not a SINGLE so-called "tea party group" was denied their tax-exempt status. It just never happened. The fact that they were asked to clarify and then justify their request for tax-exempt status was the result of the IRS simply doing their jobs, period. And of course, in the end the only people which were denied tax-exempt status were a couple of Left-leaning groups, so if actual 'injury' is to be the test for whether there should be any outrage, it should have been coming from the Dems since it was their side which ended up with the short end of the stick, not the GOP and their supporters, but then that wouldn't fit into the Rights preconceived notion that Obama was out to do whatever was possible to stop people from supporting whom they wanted to. Sorry Pat, but while you're giving good advice to the GOP you're still drinking their KoolAid:
http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/impeachment-a-bridge-too-far/
OCU
| 
