« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 21 Jun 14 5:09 PM | 25 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15702 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15701 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"and your conspiracy theory also requires that the thousands of people who saw the commercial jetliners didn't see them. observation is science."

If you in fact listen to all the data that day &
not just select the only one that supports your
belief,from those that claimed to have seen the event
you get a complete mixture...... in no particular
order!.....In fact on live TV a presenter reported what he said looked like a missile!While an experienced war reporter said it was a missile......Did Conspiracy theorists flood NY in 15 mins.....LOL!

1.A Commercial size plane with windows
2.A Commercial size plane without windows
3.A White plane
4.A Dark,black plane
5.A small private jet plane
6.A Missile
7.No plane,just an explosion

If only observation is science then thousands of
people have seen UFO's,sometimes the event
witnessed by hundreds of people at the same time with thousands of videos to support the evidence.....

So now you are changing offical NIST & radar
air speed data & basing your new speed on some
blogger working it out from a video?




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sat, 21 Jun 14 4:43 PM
Msg. 15701 of 54959

yes. i am sure the figure for limiting wear and tear was carefully calculated. they probably put some planes through tests to see how much wear and tear occurred after such and such miles.

break up speeds are more likely calculations as the test would kill the pilot.

common sense doesn't work well for you. last time it told you to ignore temperature when thinking about stress on an aircraft operating at altitude. now it causes obvious fatalities.

but unfortunately the wear and tear figures are no use for your conspiracy theory.

and your conspiracy theory also requires that the thousands of people who saw the commercial jetliners didn't see them. observation is science.

and the air speed of the united airlines flight at "sea level" was about 100 knots less than you are using.

awkward problem.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next