« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 21 Jun 14 4:43 PM | 29 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15701 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15699 by faul)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

yes. i am sure the figure for limiting wear and tear was carefully calculated. they probably put some planes through tests to see how much wear and tear occurred after such and such miles.

break up speeds are more likely calculations as the test would kill the pilot.

common sense doesn't work well for you. last time it told you to ignore temperature when thinking about stress on an aircraft operating at altitude. now it causes obvious fatalities.

but unfortunately the wear and tear figures are no use for your conspiracy theory.

and your conspiracy theory also requires that the thousands of people who saw the commercial jetliners didn't see them. observation is science.

and the air speed of the united airlines flight at "sea level" was about 100 knots less than you are using.

awkward problem.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: faul
in ALEA
Sat, 21 Jun 14 4:26 PM
Msg. 15699 of 54959

i appreciate your claim to base your beliefs
on scientific facts supported by scientific
papers.......clearly this is a False claim
as you have demonstrated you will Believe
anything you read on the internet so long
as it supports your Beliefs..........Smile

If an Airframe is given a Rating,then scientific
tests would have to have been performed.....this
is just undeniable common sense!


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next