« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 21 Jun 14 3:59 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15697 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15694 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

For an engineer to claim that a 767's airframe
has been Rated to 0.89 Mach at Any Altitude,he
would have to have seen Scientific papers either
from the FAA or Boeing etc....The FAA or Boeing or
Airbus would then have to have conducted multiple
tests on the airframe at multiple Mach numbers
& Multiple Altitudes to have given the airframe
it's rating.

Please provide the scientific studies that would
have been carried out for you & this sole engineer
to make such claims.....

This data as with the MMO data should be very
easy to find as the plane was given a rating!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sat, 21 Jun 14 3:17 PM
Msg. 15694 of 54959

it's always a weak argument that puts words in someone's mouth and starts talking about egos and needs a lot of exclamation points and capital letters.

the engineer talks about break up velocities.

the faa and boeing talk about maximum operating velocities.

apples and oranges. the engineer is not in dispute with boeing and the faa. and nor am i. indeed, you are in dispute with them. they believe the commercial jets flew into the towers.

yes, your argument depends on establishing break up speeds to generate the conspiracy. mine doesn't. i know what happened on 9/11. commercial jetliners flew into the world trade centre. i have the evidence of witnesses. thousands and thousands of them.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next