« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 21 Jun 14 3:05 PM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15692 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15690 by faul)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

yep. there you go again with the maximum operating velocities. hello circle.

the trouble you are having is that you can't find anything else. i get it. they don't seem to publish the data you need. so you are trying to pass off MOVs as airframe failure ratings.

difficult problem.

for anyone who isn't determined to discover a conspiracy, there's no issue here to bother with.

let me know if you have something new to say on this topic.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: faul
in ALEA
Sat, 21 Jun 14 2:39 PM
Msg. 15690 of 54959

Hi Alea.....


The MAXIMIM MACH is DEPENDENT ON ALTITUDE as
DEFINED by the FAA & BOEING in GOV SCIENTIFIC
documents presented to you!!

MAXIMUM MACH AT SEALEVEL 0.5 MACH
MAXIMUM MACH AT 35,000FT 0.89 MACH

You presented a debunkers website & a claim
by One Engineer that the Maximum Mach is NOT
Dependent on Altitude & in FACT is 0.89 MACH
at ANY ALTITUDE!

Either you Prove your Sole engineer's claim to be
True & FAA,GOV,BOEING scientific Data False or
Stop making a FALSE scientific Claim!

The rest of your stuff is Strawman......stick
to providing the proof that backs your scientific
claim or stop Calling it Science & call it what
it is........RELIGION & Ego!


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next