« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 19 Jun 14 11:17 PM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15668 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15667 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I understand what maximum means,i understand that
perhaps a maximum can be exceeded by 5%,but it is
your belief & the belief of the simulation that
maximum's can be exceeded by 90%....hahahaha!

You think your porsche can exceed it's manufacturers
maximum by 90%,you think engines have unlimited
Power.....you think drag & air resistence don't
exist......hahaha!

"We took the aircraft to 10,000ft and I commenced a 5 degree dive to 2,000ft and found that the aircraft attained and maintained a speed of .89 Mach (approaching 700mph)"......

Pure BUNKUM according to FAA & Boeing Governemnt Data that cites a Maximum of 0.55 Mach at 2000ft!!!!!

You have been massively duped & you can't face
the scientific facts that back it up!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Thu, 19 Jun 14 11:05 PM
Msg. 15667 of 54959

ha ha. that is your interpretation of a document whose meaning you have not understood.

maximum operating velocities are not maximum velocities. they are the maxima recommended by the manufacturers. if you measured the speeds of cars on the road, you'd see clusters at the speed limit. which tells you precisely nothing about the potential speed of a porsche.

this whole discussion has passed you by. and i know why. you are so determined to see a conspiracy that you cannot learn anything.

and so you think it is the whole world that is wrong and you who are right. when it turns out that a pilot didn't agree with your theory, immediately he became a shill.

that says everything.

everyone knows the planes hit the towers. numerous people saw it. the simulator demonstrates the single argument against it is without a basis. the error in the conspiracy theory is obvious in the fact that folks have confused maximum operating velocities and break up velocities, as well as ground speeds and air speeds. nasa explains the way mach numbers work and this confirms what the pilot testing the simulator software said. open and shut.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next