hidoma,
actually, i don't have to provide the maths. you do. you have to be able to demonstrate a flawless mathematical proof using verifiable numbers in order to demonstrate the falsity of the normal account of 911. that a commercial jet slammed into the world trade centre. something many saw with their own eyes.
i am not the one who has a theory that depends upon a single fact about an aircraft's speed. that it maxes out at its maximum operating velocity. which of course it doesn't.
it's the absence of a coherent physics/mathematical framework from the 911 truther side that is startling. that the guy you cited as the person who should command our respect, your star performer, is using figures that have no bearing is a wee bit enlightening. he thinks the maximum operating velocity is the maximum velocity of the plane, whereas in fact the MOV is to a 767 as the speed limit is to a car. they can go much faster than the prescribed limit.
no wonder he removed his innuendo laden observations. he embarrassed himself.
i am not sure what you are trying to prove with your calculation. a flight simulator set up with the actual characteristics of a 767 can reach the velocity required. i need to know nothing more. the plane velocity argument is kaput.
it kinda seems the notion that we can rely on the authority of 911 conspiracy theorists is also broken. maybe the space death ray theory is also questionable. maybe some hijackers flew various planes into various buildings as we witnessed. maybe they belonged to a terrorist organisation. one thing i do know: there's nothing extraordinary about one plane's speed. 510 knots is doable.
| 