Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Absolutely Nothing

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 19 Jun 14 3:24 AM | 25 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 15650 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15645 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

There are many......here is one of your so
called charlatans

His credentials......

Dwain Deets
MS Physics, MS Eng
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award
Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (198Cool
Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics
Associate Fellow - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000
Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems
- Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers
Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology
37 year NASA career


A Responsibility to Explain an Aeronautical Improbability
Dwain Deets
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (Senior Executive Service - retired)
AIAA Associate Fellow

The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are: (1) this wasn�t a standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in some manner; (3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the AIAA? Have engineers authored papers, but the AIAA or NASA won�t publish them? Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with organizations, but with individual aeronautical engineers? Have engineers just looked the other way?

The above entry remained at the moderated AIAA Aerospace America Forum for approximately two weeks before being removed without explanation. Click "Who is Ethically Responsible" submitted by Dwain Deets at the Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum for discussion on this entry at AIAA.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=19919


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Absolutely Nothing
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Wed, 18 Jun 14 8:07 PM 		Msg. 15645 of 54959

hi doma,

citing unlinked sources of authority is never persuasive.

what i have written is a useable framework. if folks haven't used it or something like it, i suggest they may be charlatans. eg if they use ground speed to define air velocity against aircraft parameters, they are clearly ignorant of an important fact. tolerances are reached relative to conditions and not in spite of them.

so while you may wish to humble yourself to supposed higher authorities, i have no intention of doing so!! i shall make up my own mind based on the different moving parts of the equation.

are you perhaps using sources of authority to conceal limits in your own understanding? leaving only a tendency to believe in conspiracies to judge the likelihood of a series of events?

it's okay if so. but then you are not really in a position to have a strong opinion of your own.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next