PUBLIC VERSION
IX. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Commission has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject-matter and in
rem jurisdiction over the accused products.
The importation or sale requirement of section 337 is satisfied.
The Accused Products do not directly infringe the ’151 Patent, the ”966 Patent or
the ’874 Patent.
Respondents do not indirectly infringe the ’151 Patent.
The’ 151 Patent, the ”966 Patent and the ’874 Patent are not invalid under 35 USC §
102 for anticipation.
The’ 151 Patent, the "966 Patent and the ’874 Patent are not invalid under 35 USC §
103 for obviousness.
Claim 16 of the ’151 Patent is invalid as indefinite.
The ’151 Patent, the”966 Patent and the ’874 Patent are not invalid for lack of
written description under 35 USC § 112.
The ’151 Patent is not unenforceable due to inequitable conduct.
Respondents have not failed to show that InterDigital has violated any FRAND
obligation. i
The technical prong of the domestic industry requirement has not been satisfied for
the ’151 Patent, the”966 Patent and the ’874 Patent.
The economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under 19 U.S.C. §
l337(a)(3) (C) has been satisfied.
It has not been established that a violation exists of section 337 for the asserted claims
of the “151Patent, the”966 Patent and the ’874 Patent.
CERTAIN WIRELESS DEVICES WITH 3G AND/OR 4G Inv. N0. 337-TA-868
CAPABILITIES ANDCOMPONENTS THEREOF
PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served by hand
upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Lisa A. Murray, Esq., and the following parties as
indicatedon June E, 2014.
41,, A
Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
U.S. International Trade Commission
500 E Street, SW, Room
| 