« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Lack Of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth...

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 16 Jun 14 11:27 PM | 32 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15621 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15620 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"Not sure what you mean. Maxwell, Faraday etc. There isn't a physicist on the planet who doesn't connect electricity with magnetism."

We are talking about cosmology Alea & the amount
of times cosmologists mention electrical forces
in the universe compared to magnetic forces!

"Theories about anti-gravity also exist and have been used to explain the universe's expansion. But as far as I know, no one has figured if it exists or how to test for it."

Yep....anti-gravity,dark matter,dark energy are
unproven,untested theories that are needed to
make your cosmological model work.....

My model doesn't need any of those...i already
have a proven tested force called electromagnetism´.

Your Feynman example is a strawman,my plasma
model has already shown to provide such craters
as part of normal anode & cathode plasma groundings.

Your model requires belief in unproven forces
while mine does not......




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Lack Of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth...
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 16 Jun 14 10:44 PM
Msg. 15620 of 54959

"Yes electromagnetic forces are part of standard
theory but more often that not they talk about
the presence of magnetism & completely leave
out electricty....wheras the presence of one
means both co-exist...."

Not sure what you mean. Maxwell, Faraday etc. There isn't a physicist on the planet who doesn't connect electricity with magnetism.

"The predominant force in cosmology is Gravity
even though this is only an attractive force
& is 10 to the Power of 39 weaker than the
electromagnetic force which is both an attractive
& repulsive force."

Theories about anti-gravity also exist and have been used to explain the universe's expansion. But as far as I know, no one has figured if it exists or how to test for it.

The incidence of craters is well explained by the movement of asteroids, especially in the early universe.

Your probability theory reminds me of Richard Feynman's example about vehicles in the parking lot outside his office. It went something like this: "Can you believe it? I just saw a vehicle outside with license plate G334VGN. What are the odds?" He was demonstrating how folks often get confused by cause and effect to misuse probability models. Count yourself one of them! You can't do probability backwards from the result like that.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next