Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Lack Of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth...

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 16 Jun 14 8:33 PM | 32 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 15616 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15615 by faul)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

i see the electricians have a hypothesis that conforms with their grand theory. nothing more. no results to support the hypothesis (issues with someone else's model doesn't prove your own).

clearly nasa's working theory is different. it is that there's water in the interior. this is heated as the comet passes the sun and jets push the gas out. sounds plausible. but without the confirmation of evidence, it is also a hypothesis.

meanwhile, you seem to think the scientists had a fixed model of the composition of a comet. and that somehow this was shattered by the results of the test. whereas in fact it was because folks disagreed that they conducted the test in the first place.

when folks don't know things but have a theory, and then they test the theory to achieve results, this is a scientific approach. religious beliefs are by nature untestable.

they could probably use another comet.

by the way, electro-magnetism is not uniquely a property of an electrical universe. the thing that is unique to the electrical model seems to be to discount the importance of anything but electricity.

and in contrast to your suggestion that gravity is the only force that matters to standard physics in respect of comets, actually physicists suggest, for instance, that magnetism affects the direction of the tail.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Lack Of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth...
By: faul in ALEA
Mon, 16 Jun 14 8:04 PM 		Msg. 15615 of 54959

"Objectively, the NASA team’s findings confirm the failure of a theory. But somehow that critical failure did not make the headlines, due to the confidence of the theorists that the required water must be there, but hidden under the surface. So instead of questioning the theory, the investigators are now asking themselves how ice could stay hidden while feeding Comet Tempel’s “watery” output, which they calculated to be about 555 pounds per second!"

. After noting that the surface of Borrelly was “hot and dry”, NASA scientists did not question their theoretical starting point. Soderblom did not doubt the presence of water somewhere. "We know the ice is there," he said. "It's just well-hidden”.

Considering the pattern of new findings, it is time to pose the question that no one has wanted to ask. Why do comet investigators never find the levels of nucleus ices they expect? The absence of detectable water on the nucleus of Wild 2 was particularly mystifying because the pictures revealed cavernous craters with steep cliffs exposing deep subsurface material. The absence of water in such circumstance is no small problem!

The case of missing water is even more severe in the instance of Deep Impact and Comet Tempel 1. If a thin crust of dust hides the water below the surface of the nucleus, one would think that a newly formed crater, estimated to be the size of a football field and perhaps 65 feet deep, would be exactly what was needed to add life to the comet’s water-producing ability. The ice certainly could not be more than a few feet beneath the insulating material—and that’s thinking generously. Any deeper than that, and the Sun’s heating could have nothing to do with the comet’s discharge.

Religious beliefs!!!!!!!

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next