« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: sonic22

By: sonic22 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 29 May 14 7:03 PM | 417 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 47416 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 47415 by teecee)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

TC,

Totally agree! As BM said if the ITC can call balls and strikes we will be fine. With the ALJ adopting the CAFC ruling for the claim construction of the 2 patents we have our best shot to finally get them to rule in our favor(I am not a lawyer but based on the CAFC and even ALJ Luckern's opinion from the 1st ITC if he construed them like IDCC wanted him infringement would have been found. WIth the CAFC ruling now in IDCCs favor for those claims not sure how thecurrent ALJ can't rule those 2 are infringed)




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
sonic22
By: teecee
in IDCC
Thu, 29 May 14 6:12 PM
Msg. 47415 of 48237

the ITC"S past behavior suggests they are a toothless entity at this point..which doesnt make the defendants at all anxious to settle in front of their decisions....they should put the teeth back in their bite and impose a ban....and then watch how fast the settlements flow [which is their stated goal]


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next