Good Morning Again!
I read the Bloomberg article a few times and it seems very vague.
Something doesn't read right about it.
My gut tells me it comes out of very thin air.
The total denial by the NSA is interesting.
Apparently the reporter has access to a "former" NSA employee and somewhere along the line the "possibility" of NSA involvement morphs into the "probability" of NSA involvement.
That's not reporting. That's screen writing.
I think the writer is full of beans.
It's hard to believe an editor at Bloomberg permitted that sort of 'new' article to be published.