Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Do you agree with the Supreme Court's ruling that deems caps on overall campaign contributions are unconstitutiona 

By: ribit in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 05 Apr 14 2:16 AM | 62 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 		Msg. 62666 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62656 by killthecat)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ktc
...if the alternative is to be owned by a poor person who can't take proper care of me, I'd opt for the rich person who can.

...tell me why is it that you libs think you are going to come up with an argument or a stream of thought that is going to convince me that someone else should pay my way or that I should pay theirs?




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Do you agree with the Supreme Court's ruling that deems caps on overall campaign contributions are unconstitutiona
By: killthecat in FFFT
Sat, 05 Apr 14 12:34 AM 		Msg. 62656 of 65535

Ribit:

In the olden days, rich folks not only employed people, they owned them. I bet you wingers miss those good old days when things were much simpler.

« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next