Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Voter fraud arguements don't hold water.

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 31 Mar 14 7:52 AM | 68 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 		Msg. 62430 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62425 by keystone)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

And then you have people like Ann Coulter who's a serial fraudulent voter. First claiming how she voted for Ronald Reagan when she would have only been 17 years old (when she registered to vote she claimed that she was born in 1961 but all of her other records, like drivers licenses and such, indicates that she was born in 1963) and then in the 2010 election she had moved and never changed her voter registration and so when she went to the polling place and they said that she was not listed on their roles she browbeat a poll worker demanding that she be allowed to vote or she was going to call some official somewhere to complain (I assume from either the Florida RNC or the national RNC).




Avatar

OCU


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Voter fraud arguements don't hold water.
By: keystone in FFFT
Mon, 31 Mar 14 3:04 AM 		Msg. 62425 of 65535

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp

When you want to disenfranchise minorities, the young, the non-English speaking, and the poor the easiest way to do it is with restrictive registration laws.

The voting fraud argument has been demonstrated continuously as a fraud in and of itself.

The Voting Fraud crowd wants restrictive voter registration. Disenfranchising a few million to eliminate a few dozen cases of fraud is insane.

Most cases of voting fraud are by election employees, not by the general public.

« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next