« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for... 

By: Zimbler0 in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 24 Mar 14 11:52 PM | 55 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 62199 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62192 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

OCU> whether it's worth something over $10 billion to upgrade the remaining fleet of soon-to-be-obsolete aircraft


Soon to be obsolete? Upgrades keep them up to todays
standards. I see you have no concept of what
'Close Air Support' means . . . The A10 is the
worlds premier platform for providing it. It can fly
low and slow and with that 30mm auto cannon it can
reduce a fair sized building to rubble in a short
amount of time. The fact that it is also heavily
armored and designed to withstand a fair amount of
ground fire makes it ideal.

There is currently nothing that can adequately
replace the A10.

OCU> as a percentage, more union jobs were saved when we loaned money to GM and Chrysler

And, here we have it.
Union jobs are more important than seeing the grunts
get the best available fire support. Never mind the
bond holders, creditors, and retirement funds that
got shafted when obamba failed out the auto unions.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for...
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT
Mon, 24 Mar 14 8:15 PM
Msg. 62192 of 65535

OK, the removal from service of the A-10 is only half completed with the rest planned to be either moth-balled or transferred to Air National Guard units over the next 5 years. But that still doesn't answer the question of whether it's worth something over $10 billion to upgrade the remaining fleet of soon-to-be-obsolete aircraft which will no longer be part of our first-line-of-defense, at a cost of $600,000 per jobs saved. Well, is it? And if so, why then was it not worth $9,000 per job saved in the automative industry? Or does it simply come down to the fact that perhaps, as a percentage, more union jobs were saved when we loaned money to GM and Chrysler than what might be the case when $10 billion is being spent keeping a few hundred nearly 40 year old planes flying training missions at a dozen or so Air National Guard units around the country?


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next