Replies to Msg. #868383
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
62214 Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for...
   ocu [b]Well, is it? And if so, why then was it not worth $9,000 per j...
ribit   FFFT   25 Mar 2014
6:09 AM
62199 Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for...
   OCU> whether it's worth something over $10 billion to upgrade the rem...
Zimbler0   FFFT   24 Mar 2014
11:52 PM
62197 Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for...
   I WANT an A-10! As old as it is, it's a great aircraft. We had one com...
weco   FFFT   24 Mar 2014
11:33 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: The taxpayers got a bargain much bigger than they bargained for...

By: oldCADuser in FFFT
Mon, 24 Mar 14 8:15 PM
Msg. 62192 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 62189 by Zimbler0)
Jump to msg. #  

OK, the removal from service of the A-10 is only half completed with the rest planned to be either moth-balled or transferred to Air National Guard units over the next 5 years. But that still doesn't answer the question of whether it's worth something over $10 billion to upgrade the remaining fleet of soon-to-be-obsolete aircraft which will no longer be part of our first-line-of-defense, at a cost of $600,000 per jobs saved. Well, is it? And if so, why then was it not worth $9,000 per job saved in the automative industry? Or does it simply come down to the fact that perhaps, as a percentage, more union jobs were saved when we loaned money to GM and Chrysler than what might be the case when $10 billion is being spent keeping a few hundred nearly 40 year old planes flying training missions at a dozen or so Air National Guard units around the country?




Avatar

OCU