« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: OUII

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 20 Mar 14 7:06 PM | 342 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 47298 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 47297 by amrwonderful)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

In the OUII response in the 868 regarding the power patents that were ruled non infringed in the 800, they say:


The Commission’s construction of the limitation “successively sends transmissions� in Inv. No. 337-TA-800 is binding on the Judge in this investigation unless and until it is modified by the Commission or the Federal Circuit


yet, regarding the other power patents that were overturned from cafc AND remanded with explicit instruction from the commission, the staff tells the ALJ that the commission made an error. What happened to saying the commission instruction is binding?!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: OUII
By: amrwonderful
in IDCC
Tue, 18 Mar 14 12:20 AM
Msg. 47297 of 48237

Obviously there is something wrong and not based on logic. I believe there is a significant amount of external political influence that can be put on the ITC attorneys...just follow the money and power.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next