« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: OUII 

By: amrwonderful in IDCC | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 18 Mar 14 12:20 AM | 428 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 47297 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 47296 by bim24)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Obviously there is something wrong and not based on logic. I believe there is a significant amount of external political influence that can be put on the ITC attorneys...just follow the money and power.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
OUII
By: bim24
in IDCC
Mon, 17 Mar 14 11:59 PM
Msg. 47296 of 48237

Does anyone find the the staff actions towards IDCC fishy?

this is not sour grapes(or maybe it is)… but in the 868 case, staff says commission already ruled in the 800 case regarding the power patents in THAT case and even though the 613 power patents have been overruled by the cafc, the commission should just ignore that b/c the 800 ruling has already been made and the patents are so similar.

Now, turn the page and go back to the 613 case… the staff is now contradicting the commission remand instructions due to IDCC not appealing some of the claims previously.

so in 1 case, they say commission you are right on the power patents. In the other case, they say commission you are wrong on the power patents.

in both cases, the argument is against idcc.

fishy.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next