« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

OUII

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 17 Mar 14 11:59 PM | 314 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 47296 of 48237
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Does anyone find the the staff actions towards IDCC fishy?

this is not sour grapes(or maybe it is)… but in the 868 case, staff says commission already ruled in the 800 case regarding the power patents in THAT case and even though the 613 power patents have been overruled by the cafc, the commission should just ignore that b/c the 800 ruling has already been made and the patents are so similar.

Now, turn the page and go back to the 613 case… the staff is now contradicting the commission remand instructions due to IDCC not appealing some of the claims previously.

so in 1 case, they say commission you are right on the power patents. In the other case, they say commission you are wrong on the power patents.

in both cases, the argument is against idcc.

fishy.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next