Does anyone find the the staff actions towards IDCC fishy?
this is not sour grapes(or maybe it is)… but in the 868 case, staff says commission already ruled in the 800 case regarding the power patents in THAT case and even though the 613 power patents have been overruled by the cafc, the commission should just ignore that b/c the 800 ruling has already been made and the patents are so similar.
Now, turn the page and go back to the 613 case… the staff is now contradicting the commission remand instructions due to IDCC not appealing some of the claims previously.
so in 1 case, they say commission you are right on the power patents. In the other case, they say commission you are wrong on the power patents.
in both cases, the argument is against idcc.
fishy.