« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The 'Real' Tax Rates on Top Earners 

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (4)
Wed, 12 Feb 14 10:09 AM | 69 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 61074 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 61071 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I assume then that you think we should start creating a list of the world leaders that should be "removed from the world stage" since Saddam was hardly the only one out there that fell into what I assume is some sort of category where you think it's OK to take-out by whatever means necessary, EH? Only I don't see you volunteering to pick a gun and helping out.

BTW, in exactly what branch of the service did you choose to defend our nation when you had the chance?




Avatar

OCU


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The 'Real' Tax Rates on Top Earners
By: Zimbler0
in FFFT
Wed, 12 Feb 14 9:29 AM
Msg. 61071 of 65535

Sure.
But, with a War, one has to ask "Was it necessary?"

I believe removing saddam Hussein from the world
stage was necessary. And never forget that senators
Kerry, Clinton, and many many other democrat
congress critters voted FOR the invasion.

You keep squawling that the Reagan tax cuts reduced
tax revenues. I recently posted an article which
says that while Reagan cut the rates, he also
eliminated many tax exemptions - effectively raising
the taxes on many who used to 'scam' with them.

Say what you will. Reagan's policies got U.S. out of the carter stagflation.

But my original premise was that deficits are caused
by spending more money than one has to spend. A sad
state of affairs this country has been guilty of
since Johnson was in the White House.

Zim.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next