« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: best piece i've read on the nsa and snowden 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 06 Jan 14 1:28 AM | 53 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 15091 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 15090 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

another segment:

"At any rate, operating under that apparently unanimous mentality, US intelligence extravagantly imagined that the number of trained al-Qaeda operatives in the United States was between 2,000 and 5,000.

Over the years, such thinking has been internalized and institutionalized in a great many ways, and it has proved to be notably resistant to counter-information. Indeed, officials often seem to live in what might be called “I think, therefore they are” denial.

Thus, on February 11,2003, a year and a half after 9/11, FBI Director Robert Mueller assured the Senate Intelligence Committee that “the greatest threat is from al-Qaeda cells in the US that we have not identified.” He somehow judged the threat from those unidentified entities to be “increasing” and claimed to know that “al-Qaeda maintains the ability and the intent to inflict significant casualties in the US with little warning.” On February 16,2005, he testified before the same committee that he remained “very concerned about what we are not seeing,” a sentence rendered in bold lettering in his prepared text.

By that time, however, an FBI report had concluded that, despite years of well-funded sleuthing, it had yet to uncover a single true al-Qaida sleeper cell in the United States.

Since the number of al-Qaeda operatives actually in the country came out to be zero or nearly so, and since the threat of terrorism in the country proved to be far more limited than initially feared—not even one of the “dozens and dozens” of attacks like 9/11 ever materialized of course—there might logically have been some judicious cutbacks to the funds devoted to dealing with the issue in subsequent years. Far overdue, clearly, are extensive and transparently-presented studies seeking rationally to evaluate the massive increases in homeland security
expenditures that have taken place since 9/11 —increases that total well over $1 trillion. But virtually none of this has been done by the administrators in charge.

Instead, initial, if clearly alarmist, perspectives have been essentially maintained and the vast and hasty increases in spending on homeland security continue to be perpetuated. Important in this have been increases in intelligence and policing as the questing enterprise, central to which is the NSA, continues to be expanded, searching for the needle by adding more and more hay."




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
best piece i've read on the nsa and snowden
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 06 Jan 14 1:07 AM
Msg. 15090 of 54959

Unkind people might suggest that the real reason these programs were kept secret actually stems from the administration’s fear that public awareness of their “modest encroachments” on privacy would make further efforts to encroach more difficult. Thus, Reuters notes that a former Air Force secretary ominously warns that a “growing unease about domestic
surveillance could have a chilling effect on proposed cyber legislation that calls for greater information-sharing between government and industry.” And it also notes that, after the revelations, more lawmakers signed on to legislation that would strengthen the privacy protections in the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

Perhaps, then, the programs were kept secret not so much to protect people from terrorism, but to protect the government from the annoying and inconvenient public and Congressional outcry that, as it happens, constitutes the untidy stuff of democracy."

http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/NSAshane3.pdf


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next