« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: No Qaeda Link Seen in Benghazi Attack; Interviews Show Militia and Insults to Islam Fueled Assault

By: Zimbler0 in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 29 Dec 13 6:55 AM | 48 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 59458 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 59452 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Quite frankly . . .
I do NOT believe the n.y.times.

Pro-al Qaeda group seen behind deadly Benghazi attack

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/africa/libya-attack-jihadists/

(CNN) -- A pro-al Qaeda group responsible for a previous armed assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is the chief suspect in Tuesday's attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya, sources tracking militant Islamist groups in eastern Libya say.

They also note that the attack immediately followed a call from al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri for revenge for the death in June of Abu Yahya al-Libi, a senior Libyan member of the terror group.

The group suspected to be behind the assault -- the Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades -- first surfaced in May when it claimed responsibility for an attack on the International Red Cross office in Benghazi. The following month the group claimed responsibility for detonating an explosive device outside the U.S. Consulate and later released a video of that attack.


(Article does continue. Zim.)




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
No Qaeda Link Seen in Benghazi Attack; Interviews Show Militia and Insults to Islam Fueled Assault
By: clo
in FFFT
Sun, 29 Dec 13 4:10 AM
Msg. 59452 of 65535

Happy New Year Darrell Issa....

No Qaeda Link Seen in Benghazi Attack; Interviews Show Militia and Insults to Islam Fueled Assault

The September 2012 attack on the United States diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans was led by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was accelerated in part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. 

A fuller accounting of the attacks suggests lessons for the United States that go well beyond Libya. It shows the risks of expecting American aid in a time of desperation to buy durable loyalty, and the difficulty of discerning friends from allies of convenience in a culture shaped by decades of anti-Western sentiment. Both challenges now hang over the American involvement in Syria’s civil conflict.
The attack also suggests that, as the threats from local militants around the region have multiplied, an intensive focus on combating Al Qaeda may distract from safeguarding American interests. 

READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi?emc=edit_na_20131228


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next