« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: in the words of tiny tim

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 24 Dec 13 11:35 PM | 575 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 47109 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 47104 by zzfan)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

WM implied even at the "lower" end of the rate, it is within the framework of their rate structure.

after all these years of learning thru litigation and being on the "leading" edge of arbitration, I'm pretty sure the company is battle tested with regards to rates and how it affects others as well.

This should also put the final nail in the FRAND Defense coffin for any future prospective litigants, along with DI. How are you going to cry FRAND when 3 judges decide a fair rate already?

what is their left to argue? Validity for each and every patent in the portfolio? Said devices do not intersect any claims in any patent?


Go ahead and spend your money and energy in litigation... you will just being paying as much at the end of day.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: in the words of tiny tim
By: zzfan
in IDCC
Tue, 24 Dec 13 8:58 PM
Msg. 47104 of 48237

Yes, Tiny, shout it out. I have to get back to IHUB to explain this good news.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next