« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: We need state voter ID laws to prevent fraud. 

By: weco in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 12 Dec 13 1:23 AM | 73 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 58818 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 58816 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

What we need is a National ID, Passport, Birth Certificate, Medicare, Social Security, Biometrics, Medical data, Drivers License status all rolled int a Standard System, done once, at an early age, maintained forever. Chip us all, linked to the ONE document...

It would stop all the winger garbage, make everyone part of the worldwide community, stop a whole list of frauds the wingers try to hide, like the immigration issues...

Use the same chip as your only ID on all your web access, emails, the works... Stop the anonymous BS we see from the wingers, expose them for the fools they are...

weco


- -




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
We need state voter ID laws to prevent fraud.
By: clo
in FFFT
Wed, 11 Dec 13 11:28 PM
Msg. 58816 of 65535

Five myths about voter fraud
By Judith Browne Dianis,October 07, 2011

1. We need state voter ID laws to prevent fraud.

Prosecutable cases of voter fraud are rare. For example, a 2005 statewide study in Ohio found four instances of ineligible persons voting or attempting to vote in 2002 and 2004, out of 9 million votes cast. An investigation of fraud allegations in Wisconsin in 2004 led to the prosecution of 0.0007 percent of voters. From 2002 to 2005, the Justice Department found, only five people were convicted for voting multiple times. In that same period, federal prosecutors convicted only 86 people for improper voting.

2. Requiring identification at the polls affects all voters equally.

In The Washington Post, Kansas Secretary of StateKris Kobach recently defended what he called the “reasonable” new photo ID requirements. “It’s absurd to suggest that anyone is ‘disenfranchised’ by such protective measures,” he wrote in July.

He’s wrong. State photo ID restrictions disproportionately affect African Americans, Latinos, young voters, people over 65 and people with disabilities. Advancement Project studies show that 11 percent of eligible voters, or about 21 million people, don’t have updated, state-issued photo IDs: 25 percent of African Americans, 15 percent of those earning less than $35,000, 18 percent of citizens age 65 or older and 20 percent of voters age 18 to 29.

The push for photo ID laws and other restrictions is largely championed by the GOP and conservative groups. Record rates of voter registration and turnout among young and minority voters in 2008 affected federal races across the nation, as about two-thirds of new voters registered as Democrats in the 29 states that record party affiliation. The 2010 midterms put more conservatives in office who want to combat this trend. The right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council, for example, drafted and promoted photo ID legislation that was introduced in more than 30 states.

3. The new laws are cheap for states and voters.

The Advancement Project’s report “What’s Wrong With This Picture?” shows that taxpayers will bear the costs of these measures — more than $20 million in North Carolina, for example, to educate voters and provide free IDs to those without them, as the state’s law requires. This hurts states that are facing big budget constraints. For voters, even if an ID is free, getting the documents to obtain it can be expensive and difficult.

more:
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-10-07/opinions/35277520_1_id-laws-voter-fraud-lorraine-minnite


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next