it's a system based upon hypotheses and observations which we call science. where observations conform, the hypothesis remains viable. but it is a dynamic system in which aspects of what is accepted as viable change, primarily when observation refutes a theory which was previously thought to be robust.
dogma is a position that requires no evidential basis and is not susceptible to change.
the electronic universe theory is an attempt to explain the universe by scientific means. it will be taken seriously if it does so.
you need the definition of science to be what it is. otherwise any theory is just a fantasy.
but the way you treat science as a partisan contest isn't helpful. The aim is to reveal truth wherever it comes from.
| 
