« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: CLO

By: killthecat in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 03 Nov 13 4:18 AM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 57343 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 57340 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Clo:

Compromises made to the Republicans is one reason why the program is misbegotten. There are several others.
Looks like a bunch of retards defined the final product.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: CLO
By: clo
in FFFT
Sun, 03 Nov 13 3:14 AM
Msg. 57340 of 65535

Hi KTC:

What you seem to miss, "Obama's Misbegotten Pile Of Crap" was based mostly on Republican suggestions.
Of course like every thing else, once Obama's name is attached, they OPPOSE & OBSTRUCT!

History[edit]

An individual mandate to purchase healthcare was initially proposed by the politically conservative Heritage Foundation in 1989 as an alternative to single-payer health care. From its inception, the idea of an individual mandate was championed by Republican politicians as a free-market approach to health-care reform.[13][14] The individual mandate was felt to resonate with conservative principles of individual responsibility, and conservative groups recognized that the healthcare market was unique. Stuart Butler, an early supporter of the individual mandate at the Heritage Foundation, wrote:

If a young man wrecks his Porsche and has not had the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate, but society feels no obligation to repair his car. But health care is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not he has insurance.[13]

more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_mandate


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next