Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: loop 

By: zzfan in IDCC | Recommend this post (4)
Thu, 31 Oct 13 10:54 AM | 544 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications 		Msg. 46985 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 46984 by magillagorilla)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

In my opinion, the only reason that the troll was able to purchase the patent is that the bullies in the industry refused to license from the original inventor. Thank goodness for the trolls because they at least provide the scientists an incentive to stay the course and continue to invent. This new crowd invading wireless have the same opinion regarding the intellectual property of others as the Chinese companies. They want to use your inventions for nothing. Nobody should feel sorry for the big manufacturers litigating with each other. They are making money daily. It is the starvation tactics being used on the small inventors that should not be tolerated.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: loop
By: magillagorilla in IDCC
Thu, 31 Oct 13 9:55 AM 		Msg. 46984 of 48237

Loop, I share your concerns about the “patent owner needing to post a bond”, but could this not also be a way to awaken the actual trolls, (those who only buy and litigate) into reconsidering frivolous litigations?

I can only wonder what "provide for circumtances" might mean.

Second, the legistlation would provide for circumstances in which a court may require a patent owner to “post a bond sufficient to ensure payment of the accused infringer’s reasonable fees and other expenses, including attorney fees.”

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=93545709

« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next