the notion of a nuclear strike is too verifiable by too many people for it to be effectively contained by control of the content of a website of for it to be preserved by Google caching.
Aerial bursts of any size result inthe release of isotope profiles that are (again) readily measured by many.
India, e.g , is well placed to sniff the wind and know.
Recognizing that such measurements are both routine and broadly based, real hard-core numerical data is already in the hands of many should his be the case.
Verification will leak shortly if it were true. I've watched the video, it doesn't wash to me. The relationship between flash, commentary, sound, and functioning hardware seems inconsistent with the claims.
A pinhead yield aerial burst (the smallest that can be made) would result in an absolute (LD100) of about 3 football fields (radius) and an LD50 for another one (remembering that exposure is the inverse square of distance).
Reports of casualties are entirely inconsistent with this sort of lethality. Noboddy is reporting a 1/4mile wide zone where all large mammal life perished.
Certainly the use of such weapons is likely in our future, under Bush II policy against production of such devices was rescinded, although none of this says anything about what the Israelis might be doing.
But the products of atmospheric fission are readily detectable at fantastic distances with comparatively simply technology.
It is not hide-able, certainly not in Syria.
| 