« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: 100 years

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 19 Jul 13 7:57 PM | 30 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 14164 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 14163 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"The natural logarithm is the logarithm to the base e, where e is an irrational and transcendental constant approximately equal to 2.718281828.....

Initially, it might seem that since the common numbering system is base 10, this base would be more "natural" than base e. But mathematically, the number 10 is not particularly significant. Its use culturally—as the basis for many societies’ numbering systems—likely arises from humans’ typical number of fingers. Other cultures have based their counting systems on such choices as 5, 8, 12, 20, and 60."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithm

If I'm looking for a simple number in nature, then shouldn't I be using some variation of the sorts of numbers nature applies?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: 100 years
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 19 Jul 13 7:49 PM
Msg. 14163 of 54959

Hi doma,

No.

Where's the base 10 in nature?


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next