Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: double jeopardy for z

By: tkc in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 19 Jul 13 5:14 AM | 28 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 14151 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 14147 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi CF, What could be the charge? Is there a witness that would be able to provide credible proof of a civil rights violation? Did someone hear Z call T a "name?" Is it provable that Z "profiled" T? There is nothing there I can see provable. It's just political bluster unless I missed something. It's a sad result of a poorly written law that should be revisited and at a minimum significantly clarified. Holder won't charge Z.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
double jeopardy for z
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Fri, 19 Jul 13 3:38 AM 		Msg. 14147 of 54959

exceptions for civil rights violations.

what the heck are civil rights violations. sounds like most anything might be a civil rights violation if you want it to be.

so double jeopardy when the politics demands it.

personally, i'd fire the ag. it's becoming orwellian in too many directions. treatment of the press. nsa program advice. whistleblowers. now double jeopardy.

too much politics in holder's law.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next